This publication is unavailable to your account. If you have more privileged account please try to use it or contact with the institution connected to this digital library.
Wierzbicki, Andrzej P.
2008, nr 3
artykuł
The paper starts with the discussion of the issue of objectivity versus subjectivity, stressing that while an absolute objectivity is not attainable, nevertheless trying to be as objective as possible constitutes a higher value, necessary for hard science and technology. Dangers and errors of the subjectivist reduction of objectivity to power and money attempted by the postmodern sociology of science are discussed. Then we turn to the problem of subjective versus objective decision analysis and ranking. It is shown that while all classical decision theory aims at a rational analysis and support of subjective decisions, there are important application cases, particularly in managerial problems, when the decision maker prefers to avoid specifying her/his preferences and needs decision analysis – e.g., ranking of decision options – that is as objective as possible. An approach to decision support that might be easily adapted for such objective ranking is the reference point methodology; its application is shown on examples. One of these examples is actually not an application of the methodology, but a real life problem that motivated the development of objective ranking. The examples illustrate that objective ranking might be important for management, including also management of telecommunication networks.
Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Warszawa
application/pdf
oai:bc.itl.waw.pl:193
10.26636/jtit.2008.3.881
1509-4553
1899-8852
Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
ang
Biblioteka Naukowa Instytutu Łączności
Aug 27, 2024
Jan 5, 2010
353
https://bc.itl.waw.pl/publication/224
RDF
OAI-PMH
Wierzbicki, Andrzej P. Grzegorek, Jan
Wierzbicki, Andrzej P. Klimasara, Edward
Citation style: Chicago ISO690 Chicago
This page uses 'cookies'. More information I understand